compare / sweep alternative
An automated check looked at your configuration and handed back a readiness checklist, some green, some not. And the only question that matters is still unanswered: if you turn an AI agent loose on your org, what does it touch, and what falls over? A checklist tells you that you're not ready. It doesn't show you the wreckage path, and it doesn't do the fix.
An automated assessment answers one question: what looks off? The question you actually carry to bed is different: what will go wrong when an agent acts, and what do I do about it?
A tool that reads your configuration and flags items is genuinely useful, and a continuous one that watches for drift is useful too. But flagging stops at the surface.
It doesn't trace what happens when an agent with broad permissions reaches into that org and acts. This field feeds that flow, that flow fires that update, that update touches ten thousand records. That chain is the whole risk. A readiness checklist never walks it.
So we built the thing the checklist skips. The X-Ray isn't a list of flags. It's a map and a plan, delivered by a human to the person who has to answer for the rollout.
A tool makes the agent buildable. The X-Ray makes it safe.
Good platforms are broad, visual, and always on, and that's worth something. We're deep and finished, which is worth something else. Here's the honest difference, strengths and all.
| An assessment platform · e.g. Sweep | The Agent-Readiness X-Ray | |
|---|---|---|
| What you get | An automated readiness assessment and checklist | A deep read + the map + the ten-step plan |
| How deep | Configuration mapping, drift detection, a readiness score | Blast radius & permission paths — what actually breaks |
| How honest | A list of findings | Every finding evidence-graded (Confirmed / Computed / Inferred) |
| Who runs it | You do — a continuous tool you operate | We do — read to your IT and data team |
| What it costs | A platform subscription that auto-renews | One fixed fee. No subscription. No auto-renew. |
| The output | A dashboard you interpret | A finished plan, read to the people who own the rollout |
| Built for | Teams designing and monitoring config continuously | The leader who answers for the agent going live |
If you want a platform, subscribe to the tool. If you want the answer, call us.
An assessment is a fine place to start. It's a terrible place to stop, because someone still has to read the org deeply, find what breaks, and do the ten steps. That's the part the tool hands back to you.
That's us. You bring the assessment. We bring the answer.
Here's what changes the night before you flip the switch: you're not guessing anymore. You have the map. You know what it touches, and you know the ten things you fixed, in order, and why. You can put your name on it.
show us your orgOne fee. No subscription. No findings, no fee.
questions
Yes. The Agent-Readiness X-Ray is done-for-you: we run the deep read, trace what your agent will break, and walk the findings and the ten-step plan through with your IT and data team, instead of leaving you to operate a continuous tool yourself.
No. The X-Ray is a one-time, fixed fee. No subscription, no auto-renew. You choose each engagement, and if we find nothing, there's no fee.
An automated assessment grades your configuration and hands you a checklist. The X-Ray traces the blast radius: which paths your agent can take through the org and what breaks if it takes one. Then it gives you the ordered ten-step plan to get ready, delivered by a human. A different question, answered at a different depth.
Every finding is labeled Confirmed, Computed, or Inferred, so you can see what we proved directly from your metadata versus what we calculated or suspect. Your agent should never act on uncertain data, and neither should you.
That's the ideal starting point. Bring the assessment; we read the org deeply, tell you what will break, and get you ready. It becomes step zero, not the finish line.
Comparing other tools too? See the Hubbl alternative breakdown.